TOP STORIES

Hungry China

Let me tell you about the REAL "China threat". Many anti-China camp, especially the west keep playing up the China threat rhetoric and tell us how bad China was and still is. Well, let me tell you something about it.

Yes, China was very bad. To be exact, it was EXTREMELY bad. Bad in the sense that the nation was terribly in "bad shape". Not bad as in evil as depicted by the western media, politicians and pressure groups. And she is still pretty bad looking today.

The Chinese people have always face two major problems: one is to avoid getting whacked; and the other is to avoid hunger.

In the past, China kept getting whacked by foreigners. The people were constantly harassed and attacked near the borders. So, they build the "Long Wall" - called the Great Wall by the impressed foreigners - to block all invading adversaries from harming them. Dynasty after dynasty, the walls are consistently maintained and even expanded.

Under such a protective environment, the nation was allowed to grow and prosper. However, it was also because of this condition that the imperial courts became complacent and disregarded the dire need for continual improvement and advancement of its armed defense. Government officials often turn against themselves. Political conflicts and rampant corruption eventually impaired the nation. Mind you, it wasn't once that China had landed itself in sorry state. It's a recurring problem. Consequently, they were conquered by the barbaric Mongols and subjugated by the minority tribe Manchus.

However, the Chinese gradually discovered that these invading foreigners are actually their own people. Even the once fearful Xiongnus were an offshoot of their own tribes from the mainland which migrated north. And these ruling "foreigners" eventually became their own people.

Thus far, China was well exploited... until came the British!

From there onwards, the people finally met the REAL foreigners. Awful. They were whacked non-stop by the Brits who forced-open trading ports in order to profit from China. What else you think they want to access the ports? Soon, many others join the fray to rob China: America, France, Germany, Japan, Russia... all came over to join the party. I'm sure they enjoyed it very much. At that time, the west did not have global corporate mentality yet. So, their only way to profit massively from overseas was through the use of force. If you check the number of indigenous people being wiped out in South America you'd be stunned. By this time, not only the Chinese people were throughly exploited, they were utterly humiliated as well. Sign boards reading "No dogs and Chinese allowed to enter" are still fresh in the minds of the Chinese people. And the rape.

So, China got whacked left and right, front and back and all the way. No chance at all. Despite being whacked, China still had to pay reparations to the whackers. High treason, really! "I whack you, you pay me money!" That's the way it was. I understand that today, they don't do things like that anymore. They've learnt something more sophisticated already. But that's another story.

When the Communist Party took over, China was completely plundered. Even the KMT took away all the valuables including golds from the national vault and the artefacts. The treasury was cleared. What was left behind was 3 million rogue elements or troublemakers to spy and cause troubles to the mainland.

China grew up under such harsh conditions. The Communist Party had to tackle extreme poverty and security problems. They had managed it. Today, no other nations dare to attack China again. Never! The first national problem had been addressed.

When China was poor, it did not seek to attack other countries. So poor, many of its people had to live without trousers. The Japanese mocked China for it when the latter attempt to build atom bombs. Stories about Chinese without trousers are everywhere. Some families had to share one trousers. There were reports and personal accounts about the pathetic state the Chinese were in by those who had been to China during its hard time.

Being that poor, naturally many people starved. When the west turn against communism because of its fear of Soviet Union, China had to rely on herself. And she suffered greatly during the Great Leap Forward. Millions of people died of starvation due to mismanagement of the means of production. It had inadvertently compounded the problem of hunger and induced mass famine. The people died on their own without inflicting anything at the expense of other countries.

Even today, although China's farm output ranks first in the world and had managed to feed 20% of the world's population with only 7% of the world's arable land, and with hefty foreign exchange reserves which makes it unlikely to have another famine any time soon, food security still remain a problem as leaders watched with grave concern at the country's agricultural surplus that disappeared just as the appetites of its increasingly affluent population has grown.

In 2004, the world's most populous nation became a net importer of food for the first time in its history. And also for the first time, Pakistan is being approached as a rice supplier. Chongqing municipal government is experimenting something new by leasing land in Laos to grow food for its urban population.

Food security in China is far from over. With more than 10 million peasants moving into cities each year, grain production has also fallen every year.

Still we have people who claimed to be China-lovers criticizing Beijing for accumulating colossal amount of forex reserves. One has to keep in mind that as the costs of labour increases over time, China's ability to accumulate great amount of forex will become lesser.

There is only "threat to China" no "threat of China". China was and is bad. So bad she is a threat to herself.

4 comments:

chinktalk said...

sn from Chinese in Vancouver blog tells me that the Chinese have a "slave mentality". What is interesting is that I find the people from China are more aware of their rights and feel more comfortable expressing themselves. The people from Hong Kong show the strongest "slave mentality" behaviors. Is it possible that they have been so suppressed by the British that they have simply adapted to the comfort of being the subordinate. Western countries talk about that Communist China suppresses its people and has no human rights. But if you talk to the average Chinese from China you would notice that they are quite at ease with self expression and they are quite comfortable talking about rights. On the other hand, people from Hong Kong are often shy away from politics, afraid of expressing themselves. I believe this is related to the over 100 years of British suppression. When Hong Kong was under British rule, you would never see Chinese people demonstrating in the streets, now under China's rule, the people of Hong Kong are less afraid and you are seeing a lot of self expression. When Hong Kong was under British rule, did the people of Hong Kong have universal suffrage? They did not. Now under China, the people of Hong Kong are getting more political and personal freedom. Because now it's their own country. Western countries are working hard to fragment China: arms and political support to Taiwan, Tibet, muslim states in China (Celil case). And a fragmented China will be the Hungry China.

Taikor said...

Suppress, no. Restricted, yes.

According to a poll in 2006 by World Values Survey, 96.7% of Chinese expressed confidence in their government. 83.5% of Chinese thought their country is run for all the people. So, although the Chinese don’t elect their leaders, they trust their government more. With higher trust, China’s government and enterprises are better able to enact and implement strict policies to promote saving and growth.

Like many Chinese citizens, we can see that hundreds of millions of people's lives are improving at tremendous rate. Therefore, to say that the people are highly suppressed is highly dishonest.

It is true that freedom in the Old Country may not be on par as in the west, however, freedom in most western countries spreads when prosperity rises. China is exactly in such a process. Britain need more than nine decades to mature into a full-fledge democracy. So does China, who needs time to change.

When HK was under British occupation, it was clear that the territory was only meant to be a colony which operate and serve the interest of the British government. So, no universal suffrage was given based on that ground.

However, HK did not prosper until a series of event took place after 1949, one of which was the shifting of investments where foreign investors fled Shanghai to HK and it propelled the territory's economy.

China's problems was due to foreign interference which aggravated the situation. The Chinese people suffered much. It took them many trials and errors at their own expense to finally get on the right path.

China is still facing a major problem. She needs to do things her own ways. Foreigners and pea-brained simpletons should not be getting overly emotional over its policies which they could not fully understand and appreciate. They should listen more to what the government has to say than talking.

The last thing these people - who claim to care about the Chinese people - want is to disrupt their growth and trigger another mass starvation.

Alohan said...

what i think is ,the really "Hungry" was their mind .......not their stomach....

After the Warring States period , these country has been lack of new ideology to lead the nation toward to the way to great nation !! ....

Taikor said...

The people will not innovate when their minds are closed. But with greater prosperity and freedom, the people will focus their minds on new ideas.

The more people are lifted out of poverty, the more will indulge in mental exercise and thus unleash the power of their brains.

Just under half of the Old Country's labor force is engaged in agriculture. If the government could improve the farmers' lives, more people will contribute to the growth of the nation.

I believe they're on the right track to prosperity and growth.


Quote of the day: